Blogs
Grief Does Not Arrive in Stages. It Arrives in Waves.
Nearly everyone can recite the five stages: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.
So a woman three months after her husband’s funeral checks herself against the list. She skipped denial completely. She has never felt angry. She spent Tuesday crying and Wednesday laughing at a movie, then lay awake that night worrying that she is grieving the wrong way.
That worry adds to her loss, and she does not need it. The list was never meant to describe her grief in the first place.
Where the Five Stages Came From
Elisabeth Kübler-Ross published On Death and Dying in 1969, drawing on interviews with more than two hundred terminally ill patients. Her subject was how a person absorbs the news of their own approaching death.
Read that twice. The stages described people facing their own end. They were not a study of the bereaved at all, and the model was assembled from her observations rather than from systematic research.
Kübler-Ross grew uneasy about how her work was being used. Writing later with David Kessler, she said the stages were never meant to help tuck messy emotions into neat packages, and added that no typical response to loss exists because no typical loss exists.
Her book deserves enormous credit. It dragged the treatment of dying patients out of the shadows and changed hospital practice for the better. The trouble came afterwards, when the culture turned a loose description into a schedule.
What Happened When Somebody Finally Tested It
The stages were taught in medical schools and repeated by doctors for nearly forty years before anybody ran the numbers.
In 2007 a Yale team led by Paul Maciejewski published the first empirical examination of the stage theory in the Journal of the American Medical Association, following 233 bereaved people. The results drew immediate criticism over the study’s design, and the authors themselves later proposed relabelling and rethinking the stages.
Since then, larger studies of bereaved people have repeatedly failed to find a predictable sequence. Researchers who analysed how the model is presented online found that websites overwhelmingly state the stages with no critical comment attached. They called that presentation misleading, and warned it can harm mourners by implying a single correct way to grieve.
What Grief Looks Like Instead
Most People Hold Up Better Than They Expect
George Bonanno at Columbia University did the clever thing. Rather than studying people after a death, his team gathered data on married people years beforehand, then followed them through widowhood.
Several patterns emerged. The most common by a wide margin was resilience, meaning a person stays broadly functional while feeling genuine sorrow. One analysis of that data placed around two thirds of participants in this group.
Nobody is telling you to be fine. The value here is different. If you are still cooking dinner and answering emails two months after burying your mother, that is a recognised and ordinary pattern. It carries no verdict about how much you loved her, and it is not denial in disguise.
The Swinging Is the Mechanism
Margaret Stroebe and Henk Schut proposed a framework in 1999 that explains more of daily mourning than the stages ever did. They called it the dual process model.
Their argument is that a grieving person moves back and forth between two modes. Loss-oriented coping involves the sorrow itself, the yearning, the photographs, the visit to the grave. Restoration-oriented coping covers everything the death forced onto your desk, such as the paperwork, the empty side of the bed, the skills your husband handled and you now have to learn.
Healthy grieving oscillates between the two. It is not a failure to be doing one when you feel you ought to be doing the other.
This settles a guilt that troubles a great many people. Laughing at a joke three weeks after a funeral feels like betrayal. Enjoying a Saturday morning feels worse. Under this model that swing upward is not you forgetting. It is the part of the process that lets a person keep living, and it alternates with the sorrow rather than replacing it.
Which is why waves describe grief better than stairs. A wave lifts you and drops you, and neither position lasts.
You Do Not Have to Let Them Go
Older thinking treated mourning as the job of severing a tie, with a healthy outcome meaning the bond was dissolved and the person moved on.
Work published in the 1990s on what researchers named continuing bonds turned that around. Keeping a relationship with the person who died is common and generally healthy. Talking to them in the car, keeping their chair, cooking their recipe on a birthday, asking silently what they would have said about a decision. None of that is a sign of being stuck.
When to Ask for More Help
A smaller group does get caught, and the evidence supports proper treatment for them.
Prolonged grief disorder entered the DSM-5-TR in 2022 and the World Health Organization’s ICD-11. It describes persistent longing, yearning, or preoccupation with the person who died, lasting well beyond a year and genuinely disrupting daily life. Estimates of how many people it reaches vary a good deal with the population and the type of loss, from a few percent upward.
Two points matter here. Inside the first year after a significant loss, none of this is a diagnosis, and the vast majority of people need time rather than treatment. Beyond that, if a year has passed and your life has effectively stopped, targeted help exists and works. Speak to a doctor.
Things Worth Knowing on a Bad Week
Ambushes are normal. A song in a supermarket aisle can undo somebody who managed the funeral calmly. The trigger is rarely the anniversary you prepared for.
Grief shows up in the body. Exhaustion, appetite changes, and scattered concentration are frequent, and people often fear they have fallen ill. Mention it to your doctor if it persists, though recognise the pattern for what it usually is.
Nobody is running late. There is no correct duration, and the cultural expectation that a person should be themselves again within a few months has no research behind it whatsoever.
Somebody will offer you the five stages. They mean well, and you are free to let it float past without argument.
A Page for the Days You Cannot Speak
Loss resists tidy advice, which is part of why the stage model spread so far. People wanted a map.
Surfing Sanity From A-Z offers a different shape. It runs through the alphabet, giving each hard feeling a short entry, with a blank page beside it headed THOUGHTS. Lynda Moodie wrote it after working patiently through her own painful memories, and she kept the entries brief on purpose.
On a week when nothing can be explained to anybody else, a short page and an empty one beside it may be the right size of help.
The Water Decides the Timing
A surfer does not schedule the sets. The water sends them, and the skill lies in staying with the board through whichever one arrives.
Grief behaves the same way. You will not order it into five tidy rooms, and forty years of research says nobody else manages that either. What you get instead is a rhythm, sorrow and ordinary life taking turns, the gaps between the hard hours slowly widening.
That counts as progress, even on a morning when it feels like nothing of the sort.
This article offers general information rather than medical advice. If grief is affecting your daily life, please speak with a doctor or a qualified therapist.