Blogs
You Can Forgive Someone and Never Speak to Them Again
The word forgive stops a great many people in their tracks.
They hear it as an instruction to go back, to say the whole affair was acceptable, to put their arms around a person who caused real harm. So they decline, quite reasonably, and the resentment stays where it is. Years later they are still hauling it around.
Psychologists who study this have spent forty years drawing lines that most of us were never shown. Those lines make the whole business smaller and far more possible.
Two Separate Things Wearing One Word
Everett Worthington spent four decades on this at Virginia Commonwealth University, and his most useful contribution may be a simple split.
Decisional forgiveness is a choice. You decide to give up revenge and to treat the person as a person again. It happens on a Tuesday afternoon and it takes about ten seconds.
Emotional forgiveness is slower. It means the resentment gradually gets replaced by softer feelings such as sympathy or compassion. That process runs on its own timetable and pays no attention to your preferences.
Worthington’s group reports that the health benefits lie mainly with the emotional kind, while the decision matters more for repairing an actual relationship.
Understanding the split rescues a lot of people from feeling like frauds. They made the decision, waited for the warm feeling to show up on schedule, felt nothing, and concluded they had failed. They had simply finished the first part.
Four Things Forgiveness Is Not
It Is Not Saying the Behavior Was Fine
Forgiving requires you to keep calling the act what it was. A wrong stays a wrong afterwards. Excusing and forgiving are different operations, and only excusing asks you to rewrite history.
It Is Not Forgetting
Nobody deletes a memory on purpose. What changes is the charge attached to it, which is a slower and quieter alteration than forgetting would be.
It Is Not Reconciliation
This is the big one, and it frees more people than anything else in the research.
Reconciliation needs two participants and restored trust. Forgiveness needs one participant and no cooperation whatsoever. You can forgive a person who is dead, or who has never apologized, or who does not know they hurt you. You can forgive your brother completely and still decline to spend Christmas in his house.
It Is Not a Present for the Other Person
The person who wronged you may never learn about any of it. The changes show up in your sleep, your blood pressure, and how often the scene replays at midnight.
What the Evidence Shows
In 2014, a team led by Nathaniel Wade published a meta-analysis in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, pulling together 53 post-treatment effect sizes across 2,323 participants.
People given an explicit forgiveness program reported more forgiveness than people given nothing, and more than people given a different sort of treatment. They also showed greater improvement in depression, anxiety, and hope.
Dose mattered. Longer programs produced better results, which suggests this behaves like a skill rather than a switch. Worthington’s REACH approach has since been tested in more than thirty randomized controlled trials.
Now the honest part. A good deal of this work recruited volunteers who already wanted to forgive, leaned on self-report questionnaires, and drew heavily on university students. The direction of the findings has held up well across many studies. Treat the precise size of the effect more loosely.
The Five Steps, in Plain Words
REACH is an acronym, and each letter marks a stage.
Recall. Bring the hurt to mind as accurately as you can manage. Resist the pull to inflate it, and resist the equal pull to wave it away as nothing.
Empathize. Attempt a version of events from inside the other person’s head. This asks for an explanation rather than agreement, and you are allowed to find that explanation inadequate.
Altruistic gift. Remember an occasion when you needed forgiveness and received it, along with how that landed. Most people find one without much searching.
Commit. Move the forgiveness out of your head and into the world. Write a sentence in a notebook, or say it aloud to a friend. Private decisions evaporate.
Hold. The resentment will return, probably at three in the morning. Holding means recalling that the work is already done rather than starting the whole process again from scratch.
That final step is the piece nobody warns you about, and it explains why people conclude forgiveness failed. The feeling coming back is expected. It arrives in every model.
Where This Does Not Belong
Forgiveness is owed to nobody. Anyone who tells you otherwise is usually more interested in a peaceful dinner table than in your recovery.
Pressure to forgive quickly, particularly from relatives or a congregation, tends to cause harm. A person hurried through it learns to perform calm rather than to feel it, which leaves the original injury sitting underneath, now with a lid on.
If somebody is still hurting you, forgiveness is not this week’s task. Safety comes first, and the rest can wait as long as it needs to.
Forgiving also demands no legal concessions, no resumed contact, and no announcement. You may forgive a person entirely and keep them out of your life permanently. Those two facts sit together without any contradiction.
The Researcher Who Had to Use His Own Method
Worthington had just delivered his first book on forgiveness to the publisher when his 76-year-old mother was murdered during a burglary at her home in Knoxville, Tennessee. Her body was found on the first of January, 1996.
He applied his own five steps and has said he forgave the man responsible fairly quickly. He is also careful to tell people he is no super forgiver, and mentions that a professor once gave him a low grade and it took him ten years to let that go.
Hold those two sentences beside each other. The size of the wrong and the difficulty of forgiving it are barely related. A murder went in months. A grade took a decade. Anyone stuck on an injury that seems too small to still bother them is in ordinary company.
Free Places to Begin
Worthington has put do-it-yourself workbooks on his own site at no charge, several designed to be worked through in about two hours, with versions in a number of languages. They were tested in trials across seven countries before release.
The Greater Good Science Center at Berkeley keeps a plain-language collection of forgiveness research and exercises for anyone who prefers to read around the subject first.
If the hurt is large, or if it involves abuse, do this alongside a counsellor. The meta-analysis found longer, guided work produced better outcomes, and there is a reason for that.
A Page Rather Than a Paragraph
This subject resists being settled in one sitting, which is why it suits a book you open repeatedly rather than an article you read once.
Surfing Sanity From A-Z moves through the alphabet giving each difficult feeling a short entry, with a blank page beside it under the heading THOUGHTS. Lynda Moodie wrote it after years of working through her own painful memories with the patience of somebody solving a problem rather than nursing it. Subjects of this size want room for your own handwriting, and the book leaves that room on purpose.
One Sentence Worth Keeping
If any line from the research deserves a place on your fridge, this is it.
I can forgive you and still keep you out of my life.
Those two halves were never at war. Most of us were simply raised to believe they were, and a great many people stayed angry for decades over a misunderstanding about a word.
This article offers general information rather than medical or psychological advice. If a past hurt is affecting your daily life, please speak with a doctor or a qualified therapist.